https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2022.540

To things themselves. Martin Heidegger’s contribution to the meta-theory of the I-subject

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2022)
Published: April 28, 2022
To be, possibility of being, openness, projection, metaphysics.
Abstract Views: 2741
PDF: 149
PDF (Italian): 219
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Paolo Milanesi
paolomilanesi@icloud.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-9700
Psychologist, Psychotherapist, Psychoanalyst and SIPRe - IFPS Supervisor. Lecturer at the SIPRe course of high specialization in Psychoanalysis of the Child in the Family. Member of the Cultural Association “OttoCentro”, Italy.

the author claims that during psychoanalysis the psychoanalyst implicitly seeks (using implicit theories) the patient’s being and this would be auspicious but, according to Heidegger’s thought, he also considers it difficult or perhaps impossible due to an oblivion of the being as a result of the traditional metaphysics based on Cartesian thought. Hence, he exposes, in a brief explanation, a part of the philosopher’s thought and suggests bringing the Heideggerian ontology into the psychoanalysis room. through the opening of his being man ‘exists’ and existence indicates only the ex-sistere of human life, his ‘ekstatic’ character in the sense of his ‘being outside himself’ and being exposed to ‘possibilities’, to his ‘not yet being’, which needs to be ‘planned’ and decided. the Author proposes a parallelism with some concepts of Michele Minolli’s meta-theory of the I-subject and also mentions a reinterpretation of the concept of investment understood as signification and expression of being; lastly, he questions whether in the analytic process the couple, patient and analyst, can get in contact with each other’s ‘being’ or whether this is just pure utopia.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: mutuality in psychoanalysis. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA.
Baracchi, C. (2020). Filosofia antica e vita effimera. Migrazioni, trasmigrazioni e laboratori della psiche. Petite Plaisance, Pistoia.
Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Infant research e trattamento degli adulti. Un modello sistemico-diadico delle interazioni. Raffaello Cortina, Roma (2003).
Binswanger, L. (2020). Forme fondamentali e conoscenza dell’esserci umano. Amore e amicizia come forme della vita autentica, trad. it. a cura di Discipio D., Tab Edizioni, Roma. (versione digitale).
Bocchi, G., & Ceruti, M., a cura di (2007). La sfida della complessità. Paravia Bruno Mondadori, Milano.
Freud, S. (1915-1917). Pulsioni e loro destini. OSF, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino (1989).
Galimberti, U. (2005). Il tramonto dell’occidente nella lettura di Heidegger e Jaspers. Feltrinelli, Milano.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Essere e tempo. Longanesi, Milano.
Heidegger, M. (1976). Lettera sull’umanismo. Adelphi, Milano (1995).
Heidegger, M. (2002). A che i poeti? in Holzwege sentieri erranti nella selva, trad it. a cura di V. Cicero, Bompiani, Milano.
Husserl, E. (1992). L’idea della fenomenologia, Carlo Sini (a cura di). Laterza, Roma-Bari.
Jasper, K. (1947). Von der Wahrheit. Philosophische Logik, trad. integrale di Diego D’Angelo, Della verità. Logica filosofica. Bompiani, Milano 2015.
Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachman, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (1996). The clinical exchange. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit Relational Knowing: its Role in Development and Psychoanalytic Treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 282-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199823)19:3<282::AID-IMHJ3>3.0.CO;2-O
Milanesi, P., & De Robertis, D. (2013). Il bambino clinico e il bambino osservato di Daniel Stern. L’attuale esigenza di andare verso il bambino contestuale. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 24(3), 47-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/RPR2013-003005
Milanesi, P. (2015). Sviluppo psichico: peculiarità dell’infanzia o processo in continuo divenire? Ricerca Psicanalitica, 26(2), 63-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/RPR2015-002005
Minolli, M., & Coin, R. (2007). Amarsi, amando. Per una psicoanalisi della relazione di coppia. Borla, Roma.
Minolli, M. (2014). Dispense di Psicoanalisi della relazione di coppia.
Minolli, M. (2015). Essere e divenire. La sofferenza dell’individualismo. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Minolli, M. (2016), Che aspetti ad andartene? L’amore nella cultura ipermoderna. Alpes Italia.
Minolli, M. (2017). Comunicazione personale.
Mitchell, S.A., & Aron, L. (1999). Relational Psychoanalysis. The emergence of a tradition. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA.
Stern, D. N. (1985). Il mondo interpersonale del bambino. Trad. it. Boringhieri. Torino, 1987.
Stolorow, R., & Atwood G. (1992). I contesti dell’essere. I fondamenti della vita psicologica, trad. it. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1995.
Tronick, E. Z. (2007). The Neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. Norton & Company, Inc. New York.
Vattimo, G. (1971). Introduzione a Heidegger. Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari.

How to Cite



To things themselves. Martin Heidegger’s contribution to the meta-theory of the I-subject. (2022). Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2022.540
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.


Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.