For a pedagogy of the subject: the centrality of the person in educational interventions

Submitted: December 14, 2021
Accepted: January 13, 2022
Published: April 28, 2022
Abstract Views: 3560
PDF: 175
PDF (Italiano): 534
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

This article proposes and expounds a professional point of view on contemporary pedagogical knowledge and practices, focusing in particular on the centrality of the subjects in education. Pedagogical knowledge is in a state of ‘uncertainty and precariousness’, leaving open a number of core issues concerning educational, cultural and social models. The clarification of the ‘precariousness’ of educational work deserves to be acknowledged: uncertainty becomes a healthy weakness, as Sergio Tramma points out in ‘L’educatore imperfetto’, the ‘unstable constitution’ of the educational area is its intrinsic strength because it represents the constant openness to transformation, to possibility, to the reading of change. What tension should accompany the educational mission of professionals working in the field of social sciences, which values should accompany educational action, and, finally, which proposals can be activated to create a fertile pedagogical terrain harbinger of ideas? The paradigm of complexity that runs through ‘social knowledge’ should not only concern itself with the problems inherent to readings of the contemporary world, but also activate unexpected energies and resources, promoting a rethinking of the role of the competences of all the functions having an educational-social value (teacher, territorial educator, social worker, community animator, psychologist, mentor). The challenge is to generate theories and transformative experiences that can restore a leading role to the subjects in education, both in their individual as well as in their collective roles.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Amadei, D. (2018). Quanto ho impararto insegnando. Erikson Live, Trento.
Aries, P. (1976). Padri e figli. Editori Laterza, Roma Bari.
Barone, P., & Mantegazza, R. (1999). La terra di mezzo. Edizioni Unicopli, Milano.
Barone, P. (2001). Pedagogia della marginalità e della devianza. Guerini studio, Milano.
Benasayag, M., & Schmit, G. (2008). L’epoca delle passioni tristi. Feltrinelli, Milano.
Bertolini, P. (1988). L’esistere pedagogico. La Nuova Italia, Firenze.
Buckingham, D. (2006). Media education. Erickson, Trento.
Cambi, F. (2000). La globalizzazione asimmetrica. Edizioni Lavoro, Milano.
Charmet, G. P. (2010). Fragile e spavaldo. Editori Laterza, Bari.
Codello F. (2005). Vaso, creta o fiore. Edizioni la Baronata, Carrara.
Demetrio, D. (1990). Educatori di professione. La nuova Italia, Firenze.
Finzi, S.V., & Battistin, A. M. (2000). L’età incerta. Mondadori, Milano.
Freire, P. (1971). La pedagogia degli oppressi. Mondadori, Milano.
Galimberti, U. (2007). L’ospite inquietante. Feltrinelli, Milano.
Lancini, M. (2017). Abbiamo bisogno di genitori autorevoli. Mondadori, Milano.
Laffi, S. (2014). La congiura contro i giovani. Feltrinelli, Milano, 2014.
Lodi, M. (1972). C’è speranza se questo accade al vho. Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi, Torino.
Maggiolini, A. (2014). Senza paura, senza pietà. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.
Manici, S. (2021). Adole-scemi? Manuale di r-esistenza per ragazze/i. Erickson, Trento.
Marchesi, A. & Marmo, M. (Edited by). (2018). Cose da fare con i giovani. Animazione Sociale, Torino.
Mottana, P. (2000). Miti d’oggi nell’educazione. Franco Angeli, Milano.
Neill, S. (1990). I ragazzi felici di Summerhill. Red edizioni, Como.
Palmonari, A. (1993). Psicologia dell’adolescenza. Il Mulino, Bologna.
Pietropolli, C. (2000). I nuovi adolescenti. Raffaello Cortina, Milano.
Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1973). L’insegnamento come attività sovversiva. La nuova Italia, Firenze.
Recalcati, M. (2014). L’ora di lezione. Einaudi,Torino.
Reggio, P. (2010). Il quarto sapere. Carocci editore, Roma.
Reimer, E. (1973). La scuola è morta. Armando editore, Roma.
Ripamonti, E. (2011). Collaborare. Carrocci Faber, Roma.
Smith, M. P. (1990). Educare per la libertà. Eleuthera, Milano.
Tramma, S. (1999). Pedagogia sociale. Guerini Studio, Milano.
Tramma, S. (2009). Che cos’è l’educazione informale. Carocci editore, Roma.
Tramma, S. (2007). L’educatore imperfetto. Carocci editore, Roma.
Vanni, F. (2015). La consultazione psicologica con l’adolescente. Franco Angeli, Milano.
Vanni, F. (2018). Adolescenti nelle relazioni. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Zoja, L. (2000). Il gesto di Ettore. Boringhieri, Torino.

How to Cite

Manici, S. (2022). For a pedagogy of the subject: the centrality of the person in educational interventions. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2022.607