https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2021.435
Technological Storks: Parents and Children Born Thanks to Science!
Submitted: October 6, 2020
Accepted: December 13, 2020
Published: April 23, 2021
Accepted: December 13, 2020
Abstract Views: 3690
PDF: 177
PDF (Italiano): 230
PDF (Italiano): 230
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
New reproductive technology inevitably imposes considerable value-related, cultural and relational transformations of the concept of parenthood and more generally of the concept of family. The split between biological parenthood and social parenthood stimulates numerous reflections. The present article deals with the topic of gamete donation and the need to welcome the "intruder" that lays claim to and seizes a "citizenship", which is not only corporeal or attributable to the female world but is rather an issue that regards the couple as a whole.
Blake, L., Casey, J., Readings, V., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2010). "Daddy ran out of tadpoles": how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-years-olds under stand. Human Reproduction, 25(10), 2527-2534.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq208
Blake, L., Casey, J., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2011). Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22(5), 485-495.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014
Castelli-Gattinara, P., Ardovini, C., Costantini, E., Morganti, G., & Onofri, A. (2005), I trapianti d"organo nella prospettiva cognitivo-evoluzionista. Psicobiettivo-Trapianti e Psicoterapia, XXV(3), 16-38.
Chatel, M.M. (1995). Il disagio della procreazione. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
Domar, A.D., Zuttermeister, P.C., & Friedman, R. (1993). The psychological impact of infertility, a comparison. Journal Psychosomatic Obstetrician Gynecology, 14(Suppl), 45-52.
Dotti, M. (2017). Bauman: "La felicità è la risposta a ciò che ci consuma" [Intervista]. Vita International; 10 Gennaio. Retrived at: http://www.vita.it/it/article/2017/01/10/baumanla-felicita-e-la-risposta-a-cio-che-ci-consuma/142082/
Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Lobel, M. (1991). Psychological reactions to infertility. In A.L. Stanton, C. Dunkel-Schetter (Eds.), Infertility: Perspectives from stress and coping research (pp. 29-57). New York, NY: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0753-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0753-0
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2004). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertility and Sterility, 81(3), 527-531.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.011
Faccio, E. (2007). Le identità corporee. Firenze: Giunti.
Fiumanò, M. (2000). A ognuna il suo bambino. Milano: Pratiche Editrice.
Greil, A.L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hammanerg, K., & Astbury, J. (2001). Women"s experice of IVF: a follow-up study. Human Reproduction, 16(2), 374-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.374.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.374
Higgins, E.T., Klein, R.L., & Strauman, T.J. (1987). Self-discrepancies: distinguishing among self-states, self-state conflicts, and emotional vulnerabilities. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: psychosocial perspectives (pp. 173-186). John Wiley & Sons.
Imrie, S., Vasanti, J., & Golombok, S. (2012). Centre for family research. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R., & Golombok, S. (2005). School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents"disclosure patterns. Human Reproduction, 20(3), 810-819.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh703
Mahlstedt, P.P. (1985). The psycological components of infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 335-346.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48428-1
Miall, C.E. (1985). Perceptions of informal sanctioning and the stigma of involuntary childlessness. Deviant Behavior, 6(4), 383-403. doi:10.1080/01639625.1985.9967686.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1985.9967686
Ministero della Salute. (2014). Relazione del Ministro della Salute al parlamento sullo stato di attuazione della legge contenente norme in materia di procreazione medicalmente assistita (legge 19 febbraio 2004, n. 40, articolo 15).
Minolli, M. (2009). Psicoanalisi della relazione Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Nancy, J.-L. (1996). Essere singolare plurale. Torino: Einaudi.
Nancy, J.-L. (2000). l'Intruso. Napoli: Cronopio Edizioni.
Nesci, D.A. (2007). Libere associazioni in margine al lavoro di Andrea Sabbadini sul replacement child. Doppio Sogno, n.5, Dicembre 2007. Retrived at: http://www.doppiosogno.it/numero5/ita/notenesci.pdf
Peterson, B.D., Newton, C.R., Rosen, K.H., & Skaggs, G.E. (2006). Gender differences in how men and women who are referred for IVF cope with infertility stress. Human Reproduction, 21(9), 2443-2449.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del145
Rumball, A., & Adair, V. (1999). Telling the story: parents" scripts for donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 14, 1392-1399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.5.1392
Valentini, C. (2004). La fecondazione proibita. Milano: Feltrinelli.
How to Cite
Merisio, A. (2021). Technological Storks: Parents and Children Born Thanks to Science!. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2021.435
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Daniele Morelli, Laura Corbelli, Creativity in psychotherapy as a ‘co-reflexive dialogue between acting subjects’: a clinical and theoretical proposal , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 35 No. 2 (2024)
- Cesare Albasi, Alioscia Boschiroli, Daniele Paradiso, A relational psychoanalytic perspective on trauma, dissociation, and their relationship to psychopathology and borderline organisation , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 33 No. s1 (2022): Italy and its relational proposals
- Raffaelina Magnoli, A clinical look at conflict in couples therapy , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 3 (2023)
- Federica Formaggi, What form of violence? From the violence of over-simplification to the complexity of violence. A theoretical viewpoint , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 1 (2023)
- Maria Luisa Tricoli, Becoming a psychoanalyst: supervision as a central moment of training , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 2 (2023)
- Carlotta Pizzi, Enrico Carosio, Rethinking school in terms of innovation, well-being and relationship with the world. The experience of teacher training from the beginning of the pandemic to today. Learning between innovation and scientific references , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 1 (2023)
- Emanuele Arletti, The magic of dubbing. An innovative teaching experience at a high school and a therapeutic group instrument for adolescents in Parma , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 2 (2023)
- Giuliana Nico, The father figure for a lesbian couple undergoing medically assisted procreation: response to comments on the case , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 2 (2023)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.