Scritti
29 agosto 2025
V. 36 N. 2 (2025)
Narrative digitali. Le dinamiche affettive legate all’oggetto digitale indagate con metodi proiettivi
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
380
Visite
212
Downloads
Autori
I dispositivi digitali, considerati inizialmente come strumenti tecnici sorprendenti, stanno assumendo il ruolo di veri e propri ‘compagni digitali’ che affiancano le dinamiche della vita quotidiana. Il presente studio si propone di analizzare le modalità attraverso cui i dispositivi influenzano le rappresentazioni affettive dell'intersoggettività. Alla ricerca hanno partecipato 22 soggetti ai quali è stato chiesto di interpretare narrativamente 4 tavole proiettive ispirate al Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) di Murray, all’interno delle quali sono state inserite rappresentazioni di dispositivi tecnologici. Appoggiandosi alla teoria psicoanalitica e interpersonale, l’analisi dei contenuti delle 88 narrative ha permesso di approfondire come quattro esperienze fondative della soggettività vengano influenzate dalla tecnologia: Infanzia, Coppia, Immagine di sé, Evento traumatico. L’esplorazione delle dinamiche legate all’oggetto digitale ha tenuto conto degli affetti, della rilevanza data all’oggetto digitale nel racconto e della funzione rispetto alla vita relazionale. I risultati mostrano che la tecnologia si configura come un ausilio nella misura in cui vi è buona comunicazione sul piano interpersonale reale, ma non è in alcun caso sufficiente a sostituire l’oggetto d’amore. Nella vita di coppia l’oggetto digitale diventa fonte di conflitti, verso il quale soprattutto la protagonista femminile sviluppa una dipendenza invadente; oppure viene utilizzato come arma di rottura della relazione, generando vissuti di sofferenza potenzialmente traumatici. Non mancano tuttavia narrazioni in cui il device è stato utilizzato per immortalare aspetti positivi del sé, mantenendo una apertura relazionale genuina e non dipendente da dinamiche narcisistiche di riconoscimento esteriore.
Altmetrics
Downloads
La data di download non è ancora disponibile.
Citations
Ali, F., & Zeb, R. (2023). Adaptation of Thematic Apperception Test in Pakistan. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 17(4), 80-89.
Allen, J. P., Grande, L., Tan, J., & Loeb, E. (2018). Parent and peer predictors of change in attach-ment security from adolescence to adulthood. Child development, 89(4), 1120-1132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12840
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Etgar, S. (2016). Intimacy and smartphone multitasking—a new oxymo-ron?. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 826-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116662658
Aroldi, P. (2015). Famiglie connesse. Social Network e relazioni familiari online. https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/91544
Aronow, E., Weiss, K. A., & Reznikoff, M. (2001). A Practical Guide to the Thematic Apperception Test: The TAT in Clinical Practice. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Attili, G. (2004). Attaccamento e amore. Che cosa si nasconde dietro la scelta del partner? Bologna: Il Mulino.
Birkeland, M. S., Breivik, K., & Wold, B. (2014). Peer acceptance protects global self-esteem from negative effects of low closeness to parents during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 70-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9929-1
Bion, W. R. (1998). Memoria del futuro. Presentare il passato (P. Bion Talamo & G. Nebbiosi, Trad.). Milano: Cortina (Lavoro originale pubblicato nel 1977).
Bion, W. R. (1981). Il cambiamento catastrofico. La griglia, caesura, seminari brasiliani, intervista. Loescher.
Blasi, S. (2010). La ricerca qualitativa in psicoterapia. Controversie, applicazioni e criteri di qualità. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 13(1), 23-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2010.9
Bowlby, J. (1999). Attaccamento e perdita (L. Schwarz & M. A. Schepisi Trad.). Torino: Boringhieri (Lavoro originale pubblicato nel 1969).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psy-chology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 2. Contextual influences on adolescent de-velopment (pp. 74-103). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004
Camati, R. S., Scaduto, A. A., & Enembreck, F. (2021, October). Using the projective themathic ap-perception test for automatic personality recognition in texts. In 2021 IEEE International Con-ference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 78-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9659294
Calderon, O., & Kupferberg, R. (2022). Stories Children Tell: Should the Thematic Apperception Test be Included in Psychoeducational Assessments? Contemporary School Psychology, 26(3), 387-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00357-6
Chae, J. (2017). Virtual makeover: Selfie-taking and social media use increase selfie-editing frequency through social comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 370-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.007
Chowdhury, U. (1960). An Indian Modification of the Thematic Apperception Test. The Journal of Social Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1960.9922035
Ciccone, S. (2023). Categorie interpretative, rappresentazioni implicite e resistenze di fronte alla violenza nelle relazioni. Una lettura di genere situata al maschile. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 34(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2023.756
Civitarese, G. (2020). Bion e la psicoanalisi contemporanea. Leggere “Memoria del futuro”. Milano: Mimesis.
Danby, S., Davidson, C., Theobald, M., Scriven, B., Cobb-Moore, C., Houen, S., & Thorpe, K. (2013). Talk in activity during young children's use of digital technologies at home. Australian Journal of Communication, 40(2), 83-99.
De Masi, F. (2022). La realtà virtuale e i suoi rischi. Rivista di Psicoanalisi 2022/3. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
Di Bari, C. (2015). Prima infanzia e tecnologie digitali. Profiling, 4, 1-17.
Di Fraia, G. (2012). Social network e racconti identitari. Minori giustizia. Rivista interdisciplinare di studi giuridici, psicologici, pedagogici e sociali sulla relazione fra minorenni e giustizia, 4, 14-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/MG2012-004002
Dipaola, D., Burzio, F., Nappa, N., Venera, E. M., Di Fini, G., & Gandino, G. (2023). The different shades of borderline personality disorder: a study based on the thematic apperception test. Minerva Psychiatry, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6612.22.02414-9
Fassi, L., Pediconi, M., Brunori, M., & Romani, S. (2023). Digital embedding, mental health, cogni-tion & identity. CNRS. 2023. https://ora.uniurb.it/handle/11576/2726301
Fatehi, B., Holmgård, C., Snodgrass, S., & Harteveld, C. (2019). Gamifying psychological assess-ment: Insights from gamifying the thematic apperception test. Proceedings of the 14th Interna-tional Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3337737
Freud, S. (1938). Compendio di psicoanalisi. OSF XI. Torino: Boringhieri.
Freud, S. (1925). Inibizione, sintomo e angoscia. OSF X. Torino: Boringhieri.
Freud, S. (1915). Lutto e melanconia. OSF VIII. Torino: Boringhieri.
Furin, A., & Longo, M. (2019). Esplorando il sottile confine tra reale e virtuale. Gruppi: nella clinica, nelle istituzioni, nella società, 1, 17–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/GRU2019-001003
Gabbard, G. O. (2001). Cyberpassion: E‐rotic transference on the internet. The Psychoanalytic Quar-terly, 70(4), 719-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2001.tb00618.x
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (monografia n. 2). Doubleday: Garden City.
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(1-2), 79-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0411
Gugliandolo, M. C., Verrastro, V., & Liga, F. (2019). Dysfunctional parenting and technological addictions: The role of parental psychological control [Parenting invalidante e dipendenze tecnologiche: Il ruolo del controllo psicologico genitoriale]. Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 3, 55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/MAL2019-003005
Herron, D., Moncur, W., & Van Den Hoven, E. (2017). Digital decoupling and disentangling: To-wards design for romantic break up. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on designing in-teractive systems, pp. 1175-1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064765
Imbasciati, A., & Ghilardi, A. (1994). Manuale clinico del TAT: La diagnosi psicoanalitica (seconda edizione). Firenze: Giunti.
Jang, J. Y., Han, K., Shih, P. C., & Lee, D. (2015). Generation Like: Comparative Characteristics in Instagram. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Compu-ting Systems, pp. 4039–4042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702555
Jenkins, S. R. (2023). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and other narrative assessments of bipolar spectrum disorders. In Psychological assessment of bipolar spectrum disorders (pp. 155–170). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000356-011
Jinying, Y., Wen, W., Shijia, L., & Ya, Z. (2024). Thematic Apperception Test for Suicide Risk Iden-tification: An Audio and Text-Based Machine Learning Study. Journal of Psychological Sci-ence, 47(2), 485.
Kim, J., & Dindia, K. (2011). Online self-disclosure: A review of research. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships, 156-180.
Kracauer, S. (1952). The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(4), 631–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266427
Lapierre, M. A., & Custer, B. E. (2021). Testing relationships between smartphone engagement, ro-mantic partner communication, and relationship satisfaction. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 155-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920935163
Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. J. (2015). Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001
Lebedeva, N., Chebakova, Y., & Parshukov, A. (2022). Assessment of psychological defense mech-anisms in women with somatoform disorder using Thematic Apperception Test-Based Meas-ure. European Psychiatry, 65(S1), S389–S389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.984
Lee, S. Y., & Jang, K. (2019). Antecedents of impression management motivations on social network sites and their link to social anxiety. Media Psychology, 22(6), 890–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1580588
Leggett, C., & Rossouw, P. (2014). The impact of technology use on couple relationships: A neuro-psychological perspective. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy (IJNPT), 2(1), 44-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12744/ijnpt.2014.0044-0099
Lim, M., & Yang, Y. (2015). Effects of users’ envy and shame on social comparison that occurs on social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 300-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.013
Liu, Q. X., Fang, X. Y., Deng, L. Y., & Zhang, J. T. (2012). Parent–adolescent communication, pa-rental Internet use and Internet-specific norms and pathological Internet use among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1269-1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.010
Lukacs, V., & Quan-Haase, A. (2015). Romantic breakups on Facebook: New scales for studying post-breakup behaviors, digital distress, and surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 492–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008540
Marzi, A. (Ed.). (2013). Psicoanalisi, identità e internet. Esplorazioni nel cyberspace: Esplorazioni nel cyberspace. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Mascheroni, G. (2014). Parenting the Mobile Internet in Italian Households: Parents’ and Children’s Discourses. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 440–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.830978
Mesch, G. S. (2006a). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Infor-mation, Communication & Society, 9(4), 473–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600858705
Mesch, G. S. (2006b). Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2
Miller, A. (2010). Il dramma del bambino dotato e la ricerca del vero Sé: riscrittura e continuazione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Minolli, M. (2005). Psicoanalisi della Relazione di coppia. Ricerca psicoanalitica, 16, 2, 219–242.
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?. CyberPsychology & behavior, 12(4), 441–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
Muscanell, N. L., Guadagno, R. E., Rice, L., & Murphy, S. (2013). Don't it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 237–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0411
Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nesi, J., Widman, L., Choukas‐Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2017). Technology‐based communi-cation and the development of interpersonal competencies within adolescent romantic relation-ships: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(2), 471–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12274
Nissley, G. E., & DeFreese, E. (2020). Thematic Apperception Test. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 381–385). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547167.ch133
Paparo, F. (1995). Heinz Kohut e la psicologia del Sé. Atti del Convegno: Le nuove vie della psicoanalisi. modelli interpretativi a confronto. Roma, 17, 18. Anno VII, n. 1-2, pp. 41–53.
Pediconi, M. G., & Urbani, A. (2016). Io social. Facebook nella vita quotidiana dei giovani. Psicologia clinica dello sviluppo, 3.
Peña, J., Hancock, J. T., & Merola, N. A. (2009). The Priming Effects of Avatars in Virtual Settings. Communication Research, 36(6), 838–856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346802
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in human behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Qualizza, G. (2012). Giovani e nuovi media: Pratiche di consumo digitale e dinamiche relazionali. Medico e Bambino, 10, 639–646.
Ridgway, J. L., & Clayton, R. B. (2016). Instagram Unfiltered: Exploring Associations of Body Im-age Satisfaction, Instagram #Selfie Posting, and Negative Romantic Relationship Outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(1), 2–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0433
Riva, G. (2016). Selfie. Narcisismo e identità. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Parker, J. G., & Bowker, J. C. (2008). Peer interactions, relation-ships, and groups. Child and adolescent development: An advanced course, 141–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310
Sabiniewicz, A., Borkowska, B., Serafińska, K., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Is love related to selfies? Romantic selfie posting behavior and love levels among women and men. Personality and In-dividual Differences, 111, 297–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.038
Sánchez, V., Muñoz-Fernández, N., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2017). Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, E24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.20
Schade, L. C., Sandberg, J., Bean, R., Busby, D., & Coyne, S. (2013). Using Technology to Connect in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Attachment, Relationship Satisfaction, and Stability in Emerging Adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4), 314–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.836051
Simoniello, V. (2014). La narrazione di sé nell’era della comunicazione digitale: (Ri)definizione identitaria ai tempi dei social media.
Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide. SAGE Publishing.
Snyder, S. M., Li, W., O’Brien, J. E., & Howard, M. O. (2015). The effect of US university students' problematic Internet use on family relationships: A mixed-methods investigation. PloS one, 10(12), e0144005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144005
Steinberg, L., Vandell, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2011). Development: Infancy through Adolescence (prima edizione). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Stramaglia, M. (2015). Gli adolescenti e la grande rete. Opportunità e livelli di comunicazione. MeTis, Mondi educativi. Temi indagini suggestioni. Saggio in “L’educazione ai tempi della crisi”, 5(1), 153–162.
Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2010). Health Effects of Media on Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 125(4), 756–767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2563
Stritzke, W. G. K., Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and Computer-Mediated Communica-tion: A Self-Presentational Theory Perspective. Media Psychology, 6(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_1
Teglasi, H. (2021). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) for assessing disordered thought and percep-tion. In Psychological assessment of disordered thinking and perception (pp. 169–186). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000245-011
Toma, C. L., & Choi, M. (2015). The Couple Who Facebooks Together, Stays Together: Facebook Self-Presentation and Relationship Longevity Among College-Aged Dating Couples. Cy-berpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 367–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0060
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Ef-fects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 511–527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01552.x
Valkenburg, P. M., Koutamanis, M., & Vossen, H. G. (2017). The concurrent and longitudinal rela-tionships between adolescents' use of social network sites and their social self-esteem. Com-puters in human behavior, 76, 35–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.008
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(5), 584–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
Vandewater, E. A., Rideout, V. J., Wartella, E. A., Huang, X., Lee, J. H., & Shim, M. (2007). Digital Childhood: Electronic Media and Technology Use Among Infants, Toddlers, and Preschool-ers. Pediatrics, 119(5), e1006–e1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1804
Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
Vladislav, E. O., & Drăghici, R. (2019). A Clinical and Projective Approach to the Mourning Process in the Family System. Journal of Experiential Psychotherapy/Revista de PSIHOterapie Expe-rientiala, 22(2).
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperperson-al dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
Winnicott, D. (1974a). Gioco e realtà. Roma: Armando Editore.
Winnicott, D. (1974b). Sviluppo affettivo e ambiente. Studi sulla teoria dello sviluppo affettivo. Roma: Armando Editore.
Wolniewicz, C. A., Tiamiyu, M. F., Weeks, J. W., & Elhai, J. D. (2018). Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evalua-tion. Psychiatry Research, 262, 618–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.058
Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2019). “It’s Just a Lot of Work”: Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Norms and Practices on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(1), 196–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12376
Young, L. S., & Frosh, S. (2018). Psychoanalysis in narrative research. In Methods of Research into the Unconscious. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449758-12
Zanelli, D. (s.d.). I nuovi media tra eredità, identità e legame. Disponibile da: https://www.academia.edu/39960290/I_nuovi_media_tra_eredit%C3%A0_identit%C3%A0_e_legame
Come citare
Narrative digitali. Le dinamiche affettive legate all’oggetto digitale indagate con metodi proiettivi. (2025). Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2025.945
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.