Scritti
31 dicembre 2010
V. 21 N. 3 (2010): Pubblicato da FrancoAngeli
Le risposte
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
126
Visite
0
Downloads
Autori
Si rilevano alcune incongruenze nelle obiezioni di Scano che, in sostanza, torna al positivismo. Si constata la vicinanza delle posizioni di Rociola a quelle di Sartre e si ricorda il lungo dialogo/conflitto fra Sartre e Merleau-Ponty. Si commentano e sviluppano ulteriormente vari punti presenti nelle osservazioni di Manghi, Gallese, De Robertis, sottolinenandone la ricchezza del contributo.
Altmetrics
Downloads
La data di download non è ancora disponibile.
Citations
Come citare
Le risposte. (2010). Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 21(3), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2010.474
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
