The theoretical-clinical perspective of George Downing and the conception of the subject as a living system

Published: April 30, 2010
Abstract Views: 107
View on FrancoAngeli (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Author initially describes the clinical work carried out over the years by George Downing, and explains the underlying theoretical references, with particular reference to the concept of "procedural memory" as an explanatory construct of the interactive quality that characterises every human relationship from the very first days of life. In a second time he tries to insert this concept within a wider perspective that is placed, from an epistemic point of view, in the theory of complex dynamic and non-linear systems. The motivation of the subject-system, in this perspective, is not given by the attempt to create or maintain links with the object, but by seeking or regaining the state of "systemic coherence" in a creative and continuous process. Also the concept of "recognition" is revisited according to this perspective, starting from the description given by Hegel in his Phenomenology of the spirit and in the description of the process of self-consciousness. It is inferred that the explanation of the analyst's implicit theoretical references is a sine qua non condition for giving life, within the analytic process, to a path that merges the presence of the subject's own internal states and therefore to himself.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Milanesi, P. (2010). The theoretical-clinical perspective of George Downing and the conception of the subject as a living system. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 21(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2010.488