https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2010.474
The answers
Published: December 31, 2010
Abstract Views: 89
View on FrancoAngeli (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
There are some inconsistencies in Scano's objections which, in essence, return to positivism. We note the closeness of Rociola's positions to those of Sartre and we remember the long dialogue/conflict between Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Various points present in Manghi, Gallese, De Robertis' observations are commented and further developed, underlining the richness of their contribution.
How to Cite
Iofrida, M. (2010). The answers. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 21(3), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2010.474
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.