Recomposing the pieces

Fractures and continuities in the history of republican institutions

Published: March 3, 2020
Abstract Views: 343
PDF (Italiano): 323
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The introduction explains how the whole publìcation is a contribution to the history of the Republic"s institutions, focussing on the concept of rupture: not a history of ruptures but, rather, chapters in an institutional history considered in the light of some of the main ruptures. Rupture is to be understood in the sense of a profound break or sharp discontinuity that has sometimes become a dramatic laceration, as in the case of the Piazza Fontana massacre (1969) or Aldo Moro"s murder (1978). Some ruptures have been violent. Others, such as Tangentopoli, have not been violent, deriving as they have done from processes within the political class that have largely been determined by the lack of a vision for the nation and the fact that particular interests have prevailed. The use of the rupture perspective does not have a merely descriptive function, however, since it leads to some of our political system"s structural features that take us well beyond a simple account of events.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Violante, L. (2020). Recomposing the pieces: Fractures and continuities in the history of republican institutions. Il Politico, 251(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2019.233